Family:William and Jemima Cox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Children: Updated Josiah's name.) |
(Added note.) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{IndividualShortTable | {{IndividualShortTable | ||
|[[William Cox, Jr.]]|Abt. 1762| | |[[William Cox, Jr.]]|Abt. 1762| | ||
|[[John Cox]]|Abt. 1768|Direct ancestor of [[Sean Marvin Cox]] | |||
|[[John Cox]]|Abt. 1768| | |||
|[[Jemimah Cox]]|Abt. 1771| | |[[Jemimah Cox]]|Abt. 1771| | ||
|[[Lucy Cox]]|Abt. 1773| | |[[Lucy Cox]]|Abt. 1773| | ||
|[[George Cox]]|Abt. 1775| | |[[George Cox]]|Abt. 1775| | ||
|[[Preston Cox]]|Abt. 1777| | |[[Preston Cox]]|Abt. 1777| | ||
|[[Nancy Cox]]|| | |||
|[[Nancy Cox]]| | |||
}} | }} | ||
== Notes == | |||
There is a set of children listed as children of Lucy Cox, based on an interpretation of William Cox's will. This interpretation seems to have been disproven, but work still needs to be done to move these children back into William's family. Barthena Cox still seems to be a bit of a mystery, because of her approximate birth date. [[Source:DNA Matches|DNA testing]] undertaken by a descendant of Barthena showed a reasonable match with a Kellum, renewing the possibility that Barthena is, in fact, a Kellum. Though, the testing is not of a type as would clarify the nature of the relationship. | |||
== Sources == | == Sources == | ||
Latest revision as of 21:18, 7 March 2021
- Father
- William Cox - b. 1740/1750 - d. Abt. 1820
- Mother
- Jemima Turner - b. Abt. 1746 - d. Abt. 1830
Children
| Name | Birthdate | |
| William Cox, Jr. | Abt. 1762 | |
| John Cox | Abt. 1768 | Direct ancestor of Sean Marvin Cox |
| Jemimah Cox | Abt. 1771 | |
| Lucy Cox | Abt. 1773 | |
| George Cox | Abt. 1775 | |
| Preston Cox | Abt. 1777 | |
| Nancy Cox |
Notes
There is a set of children listed as children of Lucy Cox, based on an interpretation of William Cox's will. This interpretation seems to have been disproven, but work still needs to be done to move these children back into William's family. Barthena Cox still seems to be a bit of a mystery, because of her approximate birth date. DNA testing undertaken by a descendant of Barthena showed a reasonable match with a Kellum, renewing the possibility that Barthena is, in fact, a Kellum. Though, the testing is not of a type as would clarify the nature of the relationship.