Family:William and Jemima Cox: Difference between revisions

From CoxGenealogy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Children: Updated link.)
(Added note.)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
{{IndividualShortTable
{{IndividualShortTable
|[[William Cox, Jr.]]|Abt. 1762|
|[[William Cox, Jr.]]|Abt. 1762|
|[[Josiah Cox]]|Abt. 1765|
|[[John Cox]]|Abt. 1768|Direct ancestor of [[Sean Marvin Cox]]
|[[Mary Cox of Virginia|Mary Cox]]|Abt. 1767|
|[[John Cox]]|Abt. 1768|
|[[Barthena Cox, Daughter of William and Jemima Cox|Barthena Cox]]|Abt. 1769|
|[[Jemimah Cox]]|Abt. 1771|
|[[Jemimah Cox]]|Abt. 1771|
|[[Lucy Cox]]|Abt. 1773|
|[[Lucy Cox]]|Abt. 1773|
|[[George Cox]]|Abt. 1775|
|[[George Cox]]|Abt. 1775|
|[[Preston Cox]]|Abt. 1777|
|[[Preston Cox]]|Abt. 1777|
|[[Betsy Cox]]|Abt. 1779|
|[[Nancy Cox]]||
|[[Nancy Cox]]|Abt. 1781|
}}
}}
== Notes ==
There is a set of children listed as children of Lucy Cox, based on an interpretation of William Cox's will. This interpretation seems to have been disproven, but work still needs to be done to move these children back into William's family. Barthena Cox still seems to be a bit of a mystery, because of her approximate birth date. [[Source:DNA Matches|DNA testing]] undertaken by a descendant of Barthena showed a reasonable match with a Kellum, renewing the possibility that Barthena is, in fact, a Kellum. Though, the testing is not of a type as would clarify the nature of the relationship.


== Sources ==
== Sources ==

Latest revision as of 21:18, 7 March 2021

Father
William Cox - b. 1740/1750 - d. Abt. 1820
Mother
Jemima Turner - b. Abt. 1746 - d. Abt. 1830

Children

Name Birthdate
William Cox, Jr. Abt. 1762
John Cox Abt. 1768 Direct ancestor of Sean Marvin Cox
Jemimah Cox Abt. 1771
Lucy Cox Abt. 1773
George Cox Abt. 1775
Preston Cox Abt. 1777
Nancy Cox

Notes

There is a set of children listed as children of Lucy Cox, based on an interpretation of William Cox's will. This interpretation seems to have been disproven, but work still needs to be done to move these children back into William's family. Barthena Cox still seems to be a bit of a mystery, because of her approximate birth date. DNA testing undertaken by a descendant of Barthena showed a reasonable match with a Kellum, renewing the possibility that Barthena is, in fact, a Kellum. Though, the testing is not of a type as would clarify the nature of the relationship.

Sources